[block id=”blogads”]
(61 Likes) Anyone have silicone adult sex dolls in real life? What are the latest technologies included in this product?
r may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to remove the blur. Gynoid brand I guess. The dolls they produce are of Best Sex Dolls quality and look exactly like real people. The skin texture is very realistic and the dolls are also very beautiful 140cm love doll heads full. The price is relatively more expensive than other bras.
(88 Likes) 1. Ass, Legs, Pussy
available. Stack the two sponges on top of each other, placing a latex glove in the middle. Secure everything with rubber bands. It should look like a handmade pocket cunt. Pull the open end of the glove around the sponges to create your “intro”. Tuck your new pock pussy into the sock and insert it into the boxer’s hole. Stuff the rest of the boxers with a towel to simulate legs and a butt. Go ahead and add some extra padding to your ass if you want. Tie everything up with a belt to keep everything in place. Get some oil! Assemble your toy and give it a try. Do you want something a little more?
(49 Likes) Should I let my husband buy a sex doll? Unless I tell her I’m fertile (we’re trying for our second child).
doll (as if she decides to buy one, you can stop her). I say start with the idea that the two of you have to try for a second child by an uncomfortable amount. 140cm love doll heads f marital dysfunction. You say that intimacy in your marriage is practically non-existent, except when you can be fertile so that you can get pregnant. This is not the profile of a healthy marriage. It would be different if you mostly didn’t care if you were sexually unfamiliar with the Sex Doll Torso, but from the way you describe it (“She’s barely touching me”), it’s clear that you’re not happy with the situation. Now he says he wants a sex doll for you. You clearly know that buying a sex doll will not improve the quality of the intimacy between the two of you. So here you see that she doesn’t want any more sex with you, a living, breathing woman who wants it and with whom she supposedly shares her life and a child. If that’s the marriage you want, it’s up to you. But IYO, how fair is it to bring another child in on an innocent child who had no say in growing up as a divorced child? My suggestion is to put the idea of a second baby on hold for now and see if your disability marriage can get on an even path for the child you have now, or accept that this marriage will never work out and start creating a plan.
(84 Likes) What are the most realistic sex dolls on the market for the money?
I was single for years and wouldn’t want my right (or left, idk) hand to be my only friend, I would buy one. Reasons can be: Always in the mood ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Never leaves me Doesn’t complain or nag (regardless of gender) Doesn’t expect anything in return Doesn’t need emotional attachment As a result, Thirsty As Hell, who doesn’t seek a partner and just wants to satisfy their appetite I think they’re pretty awesome for ™ people.
(67 Likes) When the minimum wage is increased to $15, will there be an increase in the salaries of those who make this increase?
The simple answer is that you have to think of the increase in the minimum wage as a “wage fluctuation,” or the start of a wave that starts at the lowest wage and then expands upward. Raising the wages of workers who earn slightly more than the minimum wage BUT – that increase is dispersed as they rise. CURRENT, REASONABLE, FORESEEABLE INCREASE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE REDUCES INCOME INEQUALITY WITHOUT INCREASING UNEMPLOYMENT[1]
Increasing the minimum wage creates inflationary pressure on an economy. However, concluding that inflation absorbs minimum wage growth is not supported by any macroeconomic research. It’s also a testament to the brilliance of a very cynical marketing effort trying to win arguments through a constant disinformation campaign, when he admits that facts don’t make good politics. Basically, changes in the minimum wage are related to the redistribution of wealth. There are many who believe that our current level of income inequality is a healthy byproduct of a functioning capitalist economy. I argue that these people do not understand capitalism and are deliberately blind to how devastating current levels of inequality are to our national productivity. Joseph Stiglitz was awarded the Nobel Prize in part for his work in this field. A really good summary of Joseph Stiglitz’s book From the Price of Inequality: On the 1 Percent Problem: If raising the minimum wage is good, who would object to it? In the long run, there is some good evidence that minimum wage increases benefit nearly everyone. HOWEVER, in the short run, the minimum wage allowance “labor” increases at the expense of “capital”. In other words, these changes are BEST for everyone. productive v. Rent Seeking Behavior. One of the most insidious by-products of income inequality is the dramatic increase in rent-seeking behavior; It is a pattern of behavior of wealthy interests that “change the rules” of our economy to redistribute a disproportionate share of resources without providing any value in return. There was a Presidential study on our “fraudulent economy” in 2017, I will cite the study as a footnote.[1]But here’s a rundown: How Rent-Seeking Perpetuates Inequality Those who oppose Minimum Wage Increases tend to be the same lobbying groups that sponsor an agenda of rent-seeking behaviors that exacerbate income inequality.[2]. These notable ‘non-beneficiaries’ also tend to contribute greatly to conservative causes. And like capital gains tax[3]inheritance tax[4][5] and regulations surrounding banking reform[6], these contributors are fully aware that they are advocating an unpopular position. That is, they cannot show their cards and admit their true intentions (would you?) – they need to come up with other arguments.[7]
So here’s what they do: Instead of discussing issues, create counter-narratives that confuse voters.[8][9][10] Rather than using facts to defend an unpopular position, their arguments are reshaped by the reducing power of populist politics and then detonated through established channels of ideologically inspired dogmas. Now we are arguing about something other than the main issue. Most people are misled by their intuition on this issue. The “new” minimum wage argument has been moved away from peer-reviewed research into a well-crafted, solid narrative. Instead of facts, the voter hears an oversimplified “thought experiment” to cause him to conclude that he understands the issue. From there, it’s easy to convince that voter that you can guess their views on something similar to the same problem. But it isn’t – and the same intellectual arrogance that gets excited to “understand” one problem prevents us from seeing that it doesn’t apply to the other problem. That’s the essence of conservative marketing, and it’s very effective.[11]
Who needs facts when you have a “thought experiment”? Think about the minimum wage argument you hear all the time. “If I did a job and suddenly the enactment of the minimum wage caused me to pay that worker more, I would hire fewer workers.”[12]
It sounds like a good argument, and its brilliance comes from asking the wrong question. It offers a simple microeconomic structure to refute a much more nuanced macroeconomic problem. This distinction sounds like semantics to me, but it goes much further. Micro: Focuses on the decision of a single entity. And how the laws of supply and demand make a particular decision about price level or resource allocation. Macro: Focuses on the behavior of the economy as a whole and focuses on entire industries and economies, not just specific companies. It looks at economy-wide phenomena such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), how decisions affect unemployment, national income, growth rate and price levels. By reducing the broad question of how the minimum wage affects the economy to “what would I do if something cost more?” conservatives reframe the argument. The micro question is the wrong question: it ignores all the secondary effects of the minimum wage: specifically (1) improves social mobility (2) reduces poverty (3) increases economic activity (4) increases monetary momentum. A better question to think about the minimum wage. A more accurate micro-question would be: “If I ran a business and suddenly the minimum wage went into effect causing me to pay that worker more, BUT because the additional wages these workers were getting meant I had new clients. the money I spend on my job…” The secondary effects are important – even in thought experiments… But even economists can’t agree on the minimum wage, right? Not much. The minimum wage is one of the most studied phenomena in the entire economy, and the collective understanding is best expressed in Card Krueger’s 1993 paper Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania This is a comparative study of a single person. is work. MSA covering two states, one with a minimum wage increase and the other without. It turned out that raising the minimum wage did not affect the increase in employment. The AMA contributed to better lives for low-income people who benefited from the pay increase. There have been some updates since – especially notable were Belman and Wolfson[13]
To be clear, this is not a “stand-alone study” but the culmination of 50 years of economic research on the subject. That’s what the real scientific process is all about – rarely “revolutionary” – and more often a collection of small, contentious, mysterious studies that support a slow and steady march of progress. Doesn’t the inflation caused by the minimum wage increase eliminate the benefit of the increase? not even near [14]Our economy is big. The impact of the minimum wage increase on the wider economy is minimal. However, a meaningful minimum wage provides upward mobility. You want to know what destroys an economy: no hope… But ideology persists – especially when misguided[15]. Even independently, the study blocked a number of well-funded and increasingly stupid attacks for one reason: it’s true. (An example of the problems with the most recent “study” that the Heritage Foundation’s researchers (not economists) have created is a study on Seattle’s minimum wage hike. Not surprisingly, they wrote an intellectually dishonest piece. Seattle’s $15 Issues with a New Study on the Minimum Wage) Frankly, I blame the Democrats. Rather than using facts to refute an intellectually flawed attack, Democrats are promoting a “hardship at the bottom” story[16]. But ignoring the conservative dishonesty, they unwittingly affirm it. If voters understood how wealthy interests co-opted misunderstood policies such as opposition to minimum wages to support the largest transfer of wealth in history, they might eventually recognize these “job creators” for what they are. The Economist had a good article on this: The rich, the poor and the growing gap between them Instead, Democrats focus on philanthropy and empathy – both noble ideals – but completely inadequate for this ‘knife-fight’.[17] Still, you can’t blame the GOP… it represents their true base.[18] I’m disappointed that Dems didn’t want to scrap a bit. Read some more, if you like: Angry restaurant worker / Jezebel blogger: angry but basically right[19]
footnotes
[1] Xs://obamawhitehouse.archives…
[2] How does a powerful right lobby plan to stop minimum wage increases?
[3] Republican “Small Business” Tax Cuts Could Help Mostly Wealthy Individuals
[4] A big tax cut for billionaires, courtesy of the GOP
[5] Property Tax Used to Be Popular — Even With Republicans
[6] How Banks and Republicans Plan to Kill Financial Reform Under Trump
[7] How ‘Election’ Was the Most Misleading Word in Politics
[8] Trump Supporters Seem Not Ignorant, but Misinformed
[9] The GOP’s Misinformation Problem
[10] Conservative Voters Aren’t the Only Cause – Lawyers, Gun Money
[11] Frank Luntz’s Pain
[12] Column: Why is raising the minimum wage good economics?
[13] X://research.upjohn.org/cgi/v…
[14] Column: Why is raising the minimum wage good economics?
[15] Confirmation bias – Wikipedia
[16] I Don’t Know How To Explain To You That You Should Care About Others
[17] Opinion | Encourage, Fight Like Democrats and Republicans
[18] Plutocracy – Wi
